Safest assisted living in Pasadena, ranked by inspection data
On this page5 sections
This is one of our California city safety reports. See the other markets or read the methodology behind the FYI Safety Score.
The safest assisted living facility in Pasadena is El Molino Rose Villa, a 6-bed small care home with an FYI Safety Score of 9.6. It has 4 state inspections on record, zero citations, and zero substantiated complaints across 10 years of licensing.
But the larger story for Pasadena is the market itself. The average score across 32 Pasadena facilities is 6.85, notably below the California state average. Only 4 facilities score in the Excellent band. The supply of strong options is thinner here than in most other California cities of similar size.
Below are the 15 facilities at the top of the Pasadena ranking and how the rest of the market looks once you zoom out. The data was pulled from California state inspection records in May 2026.
Pasadena has 32 licensed assisted living facilities, a smaller pool than nearby LA County cities. The 15 below represent nearly half of the entire local market sorted by safety score, so the rank position matters: a #15 in Pasadena isn't comparable to a #15 in LA.
The 15 strongest assisted living facilities in Pasadena
The ranking is the FYI Safety Score on a 1.0 to 10.0 scale, computed from the public state inspection record. Because Pasadena's pool is small, this represents the upper half of the entire local market.
| # | Facility | Score | State visits | Years licensed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | El Molino Rose Villa (6 beds) | 9.6 | 4 | 10 |
| 2 | Garfield Villas LLC (40 beds) | 9.5 | 13 | 7 |
| 3 | The Retreat (9 beds) | 9.4 | 7 | 21 |
| 4 | Montevista Garden (6 beds) | 9.4 | 10 | 12 |
| 5 | Bella Vista (72 beds) | 8.9 | 16 | 13 |
| 6 | Pasadena Mansion (6 beds) | 8.8 | 10 | 21 |
| 7 | Moon Light Boarding Care INC (6 beds) | 8.8 | 10 | 4 |
| 8 | Monte Vista Grove Homes (66 beds) | 8.8 | 8 | 33 |
| 9 | Pasa Alta West (6 beds) | 8.1 | 6 | 32 |
| 10 | Grant Serenity Homes of Sierra Madre, Inc. (6 beds) | 8.0 | 6 | 4 |
| 11 | Morningstar of Pasadena (310 beds) | 7.7 | 41 | 4 |
| 12 | Santa Barbara Guest Home #2 (6 beds) | 7.7 | 4 | 12 |
| 13 | Bungalow (6 beds) | 7.6 | 6 | 9 |
| 14 | Hastings Ranch Home (6 beds) | 7.5 | 8 | 5 |
| 15 | Pasadena Highlands (245 beds) | 7.2 | 30 | 5 |
Scores reflect citation history, complaint patterns, and recency — see our methodology. Linked facility names open the full inspection record.
Two things worth noticing.
First, only the top facility is clean (zero across the board). After #1, even the top of the Pasadena list has some accumulated citations and complaints in the record. The market simply doesn't have many facilities with the kind of multi-year, multi-inspection clean records we see at the top of other California cities.
Second, the scores fall quickly. By #10 the score is dropping into the 9.0s only with notable findings on the record. Pasadena families researching care should be especially careful to read the underlying inspection records rather than relying on score alone.
What the distribution looks like across the rest of Pasadena
| Score | What it means | Facilities | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9.0–9.9 | Excellent. Strong record, no significant recent findings | 4 | 13% |
| 8.0–8.9 | Good. Minor history, recent record is clean | 6 | 19% |
| 6.0–7.9 | Fair. Some recent findings worth asking about | 15 | 47% |
| 4.0–5.9 | Poor. Substantial recent record | 4 | 13% |
| <4.0 | Severe. Concerning pattern, dig into the raw record | 3 | 9% |
Only about 31% of Pasadena facilities score Good or Excellent, the lowest concentration of strong facilities in any market we've ranked. About 22% score Poor or Severe. The Fair band is large; nearly half the market sits in the 6.0-to-7.9 range, where individual records vary widely.
The other end of the list
We publish this part for the same reason we publish the top. A facility on this list isn't necessarily dangerous today. It's a facility where the public record contains enough recent findings that the right move is to dig into the raw inspection history and ask specific questions before deciding.
| # | Facility | Score | Findings | State visits | Years licensed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Astoria Park Senior Living (220 beds) | 1.0 | 15 / 29 / 18 | 66 | 3 |
| 2 | Pasadena Villa Senior Living (97 beds) | 1.0 | 28 / 62 / 39 | 177 | 5 |
| 3 | Del Mar Park (124 beds) | 3.5 | 7 / 10 / 9 | 27 | 11 |
Findings column: Type A citations / Type B citations / substantiated complaints. Scores also reflect recency weighting — see our methodology.
The Pasadena concerning list includes Pasadena Villa Senior Living with 177 state inspections on record. That's the highest state visit count of any facility in our 19-city analysis. The inspection density alone tells you something: the state has been actively tracking this facility for a long time, and the 28 Type A citations and 39 substantiated complaints suggest persistent issues.
If you're looking at one of these and the score is concerning, the right move is to click through, read the record, then call the facility and ask them directly what happened and what changed. A facility that owns its history and can speak specifically to corrective actions is in a very different position than one that doesn't.
How does Pasadena compare to the rest of California?
Pasadena is well below the state average. The average score across 32 facilities is 6.85, the second-lowest in our 19-city analysis (after Fremont at 5.97).
A few other California cities are worth a comparison: Modesto sits at 8.34 (highest among major CA cities), San Diego and Fresno at 8.02 (well above), Riverside at 7.99 with zero severely-rated facilities, and Bakersfield at 7.09 (also below average but higher than Pasadena).
How to use this list
The score is the gut check. The visit is the field test. The conversations with current residents and frontline staff are the verification. A high score is not a guarantee, and a low score is not a verdict. They're starting points for asking the right questions.
In a market like Pasadena where the average is lower, the work of reading the underlying records matters more. The top of the list still represents strong options, but the middle warrants more scrutiny than it would in a stronger market.
Browse all California assisted living facilities by safety score on the AssistedLiving.fyi map.
For families researching what to do with this information once they have it, the companion guides are Why Yelp reviews don't predict quality of care and How to do a safety vibe check without trusting marketing.
Data: Computed from California Department of Social Services Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) inspection records, ingested into AssistedLiving.fyi. Safety scores reflect the inspection record as of May 2026 and may change as new visits are documented. The FYI Safety Score is provided for informational purposes only and is not a guarantee or prediction of the safety, quality, or suitability of any facility. Always visit in person before deciding.
Frequently asked questions
What is the safest assisted living facility in Pasadena?
Among the 32 licensed assisted living facilities in Pasadena, the highest FYI Safety Score is held by El Molino Rose Villa, a 6-bed small care home scoring 9.6 with zero citations and zero substantiated complaints across 4 state inspections.
How many assisted living facilities are in Pasadena?
There are 32 licensed assisted living facilities in Pasadena. The market is smaller than other LA County cities and tilts noticeably below the California average for safety.
Is Pasadena a safe market for assisted living?
Pasadena's market is below the California state average. The average FYI Safety Score across 32 facilities is 6.85, lower than most major California cities. Pasadena has only 4 Excellent-rated facilities and 3 in the Severe range, including Pasadena Villa Senior Living, which has 177 state inspections on record.
How is the FYI Safety Score calculated?
The FYI Safety Score is a 1.0 to 10.0 rating computed from California Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) inspection records. It weighs three components: Type A citations (immediate-risk violations), Type B citations (less severe violations), and substantiated complaints. Recent findings count more than older ones. The full methodology is at assistedliving.fyi/safety-score. No facility can pay to improve their score.
What does a low safety score actually mean?
A low score reflects what state inspectors have documented over years of visits: citations, substantiated complaints, severity, and recency. It does not necessarily mean a facility is unsafe today. But it does mean the public record contains enough findings that families should ask specific questions and review the underlying inspection reports before deciding.
About the author
Steve Selzer is the founder of AssistedLiving.fyi. He started this work while searching for assisted living for his mom, who has dementia, after running into the same opaque pricing, sales calls, and impossible-to-read inspection records that every family in the same situation runs into. The site exists to make the information families actually need easier to find.